<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GPS Review &#187; NAVTEQ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gpsreview.net/category/gps-software/navteq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gpsreview.net</link>
	<description>GPS Reviews for Garmin, Magellan, TomTom, and other GPS Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:24:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>TÜV SÜD Claims Tele Atlas Maps Most Accurate</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/tuv-sud-claims-tele-atlas-maps-most-accurate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gpsreview.net/tuv-sud-claims-tele-atlas-maps-most-accurate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAVTEQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tele Atlas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=3007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an interesting study coming out today from TÜV SÜD in conjunction with Tele Atlas. TÜV SÜD is a testing, inspection and certification organization which (I assume) was commissioned by Tele Atlas to conduct a test of map accuracy. Their results showed that the Tele Atlas maps were more accurate in two-thirds of markets [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gpsreview.net/tuv-sud-claims-tele-atlas-maps-most-accurate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Painting the Traffic Picture</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/painting-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gpsreview.net/painting-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INRIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAVTEQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tele Atlas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Traffic is being drawn in more places every day. From Google Maps to your local TV news, from GPS devices, to iPhone apps&#8211; everyone wants traffic information. Now I love data, stats, figures, and charts as much as the next guy but trying to interpret traffic data is almost as frustrating as traffic itself. Here [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gpsreview.net/painting-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Correct a GPS Map Error</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/how-to-correct-a-gps-map-error/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gpsreview.net/how-to-correct-a-gps-map-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS 101]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAVTEQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tele Atlas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m frequently contacted by business owners regarding map errors on GPS devices. The most common scenario is that they themselves don&#8217;t own a GPS, but their customers do. When their customers use a GPS to navigate to their location they end up a long ways away from where they need to be. This happens with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gpsreview.net/how-to-correct-a-gps-map-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dash to use NAVTEQ Traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/dash-to-use-navteq-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gpsreview.net/dash-to-use-navteq-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAVTEQ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dash announced today that they have selected NAVTEQ as a partner to provide traffic information from NAVTEQ traffic. This is somewhat of a surprising development. As you likely know, Dash&#8217;s initial concept was to use their own fleet of customers to provide &#8220;crowd sourcing&#8221; of traffic data. People driving with the Dash Express device would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gpsreview.net/dash-to-use-navteq-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GPS Companies Blogging and on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/gps-blogs-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gpsreview.net/gps-blogs-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeLorme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAVTEQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomTom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=1905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past couple of months more companies in the GPS industry have been jumping on the social media track. We&#8217;ve seen various blogs and even Twitter accounts appear&#8211; some executed better than others but all worthy of being mentioned. So I thought it would be appropriate to create a directory of sorts where you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gpsreview.net/gps-blogs-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Garmin nuMaps Guarantee</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/garmin-numaps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gpsreview.net/garmin-numaps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAVTEQ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=1767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Garmin announced today a new program we&#8217;ve been hoping for, ever since they eliminated their map update policy. Although not available until October 15, and it only applies to devices purchased after August 17th, if a new map is available within 60 days of purchasing a &#8220;new Nuvi or Zumo&#8221;, you will now be entitled [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gpsreview.net/garmin-numaps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Putting a Business on the Map</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/add-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gpsreview.net/add-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAVTEQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tele Atlas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/add-business/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve received an increasing number of emails from small business owners recently. They want to know how to get themselves &#8220;on the map&#8221; so to speak. They might have a GPS of their own and have tried unsuccessfully to find their business, or it might be a new business and they assume they are not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gpsreview.net/add-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GPS at CES 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/gps-ces-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gpsreview.net/gps-ces-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS Receivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geocaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INRIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magellan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAVIGON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAVTEQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NemeriX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outdoor/ Handheld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tele Atlas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomTom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/gps-ces-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve never been a fan of the &#8220;Acme Company announced this at CES today&#8221; type coverage even though I&#8217;ve done it in the past. So instead what you will get below is more of &#8220;quick pressions&#8221; in a Twitted style. Plus I figure I&#8217;m here to meet and see&#8230; I can write in detail after [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gpsreview.net/gps-ces-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAVTEQ VS Tele Atlas</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/navteq-vs-tele-atlas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gpsreview.net/navteq-vs-tele-atlas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAVTEQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tele Atlas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/navteq-vs-tele-atlas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the big debates in the USA GPS market is the source of map databases. Most GPS enthusiasts have maintained that NAVTEQ data is more complete in the USA. I&#8217;ve always maintained there are errors found in both systems and the differences between the two are negligible. With the debate as hot as ever, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gpsreview.net/navteq-vs-tele-atlas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAVTEQ Purchases Traffic.com</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/navteq-purchases-trafficcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gpsreview.net/navteq-purchases-trafficcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 13:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAVTEQ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/navteq-purchases-trafficcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big news in mapping and traffic reporting systems today as NAVTEQ has purchased Traffic.com. The deal is reportedly for about $179 million in cash plus stock. This looks to be a fantastic move for NAVTEQ as Traffic.com provides a fantastic service. (We&#8217;ve previously covered some of the things we really like about traffic.com in our [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gpsreview.net/navteq-purchases-trafficcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
