<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DeLorme PN-30</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gpsreview.net/delorme-pn-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/delorme-pn-30/</link>
	<description>GPS Reviews for Garmin, Magellan, TomTom, and other GPS Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:27:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/delorme-pn-30/#comment-66335</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2370#comment-66335</guid>
		<description>In theory-- you could almost test it by turning off the electronic compass and barometric pressure gauge on the PN-40. It might not be 100% valid, but could be an indicator. However.... DeLorme tells me that the electronic compass and barometric pressure sensor on the PN-40 use very little battery and that the dual-processor is the big hog. When I&#039;ve turned off the electronic compass and barometric pressure sensor on the PN-40 I don&#039;t see much change in battery life which seems to support what DeLorme says, however a real test of the PN-30 as you say would trump any speculation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In theory&#8211; you could almost test it by turning off the electronic compass and barometric pressure gauge on the PN-40. It might not be 100% valid, but could be an indicator. However&#8230;. DeLorme tells me that the electronic compass and barometric pressure sensor on the PN-40 use very little battery and that the dual-processor is the big hog. When I&#8217;ve turned off the electronic compass and barometric pressure sensor on the PN-40 I don&#8217;t see much change in battery life which seems to support what DeLorme says, however a real test of the PN-30 as you say would trump any speculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/delorme-pn-30/#comment-66332</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2370#comment-66332</guid>
		<description>When the PN-30 gets reviewed, I would hope to see a direct comparison between it and the PN-40.  One thing I&#039;ve noticed on other GPS units is that battery life is reportedly better on those units without a barometric altimeter and electronic compass.  As the PN-40 seems rather battery hungry, the PN-30 could be a welcome alternative for those who don&#039;t require those two features and desire longer battery life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the PN-30 gets reviewed, I would hope to see a direct comparison between it and the PN-40.  One thing I&#8217;ve noticed on other GPS units is that battery life is reportedly better on those units without a barometric altimeter and electronic compass.  As the PN-40 seems rather battery hungry, the PN-30 could be a welcome alternative for those who don&#8217;t require those two features and desire longer battery life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lunker</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/delorme-pn-30/#comment-66148</link>
		<dc:creator>Lunker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2370#comment-66148</guid>
		<description>And I forgot to mention, a barometric altimeter is only as accurate as the known altitude/pressure reading at the current time and place. A barometer will only show you pressure increase/decrease of the weather as it changes. Really good for letting you know if the weather is going to change for better or worse. For more accurate altimeter readings, I prefer to trust a 32 channel satellite triangulation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I forgot to mention, a barometric altimeter is only as accurate as the known altitude/pressure reading at the current time and place. A barometer will only show you pressure increase/decrease of the weather as it changes. Really good for letting you know if the weather is going to change for better or worse. For more accurate altimeter readings, I prefer to trust a 32 channel satellite triangulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lunker</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/delorme-pn-30/#comment-66147</link>
		<dc:creator>Lunker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2370#comment-66147</guid>
		<description>The pn-30 just came out after the pn-40. It has no 3 axis compass or barometric meter. So the only difference between the two, with the pn-30, you won&#039;t know your true compass reading while hanging in a tree upside down and whether or not you&#039;re about to get rained on. Other than that, they&#039;re supposedly the same with one exception, color.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pn-30 just came out after the pn-40. It has no 3 axis compass or barometric meter. So the only difference between the two, with the pn-30, you won&#8217;t know your true compass reading while hanging in a tree upside down and whether or not you&#8217;re about to get rained on. Other than that, they&#8217;re supposedly the same with one exception, color.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/delorme-pn-30/#comment-66137</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2370#comment-66137</guid>
		<description>The DeLorme Earthmate PN-40 improves on the PN-30 in these ways:

3-axis electronic compass, performs in any position, while in motion or standing still 
Sensitive barometric altimeter for accurate altitude readings 

Think that means there is no e-compass or altimeter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DeLorme Earthmate PN-40 improves on the PN-30 in these ways:</p>
<p>3-axis electronic compass, performs in any position, while in motion or standing still<br />
Sensitive barometric altimeter for accurate altitude readings </p>
<p>Think that means there is no e-compass or altimeter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/delorme-pn-30/#comment-62619</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2370#comment-62619</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure the price is odd. You can currently find the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gpsreview.net/delorme-pn-40/#sdctable&quot;&gt;pn-40 for $299&lt;/a&gt; and just because it is &quot;newer&quot; doesn&#039;t necessarily mean it has better or even the same features as the 40. Since the designation is between the 20 and 40, that might imply a feature-set between as well, in-line with the price. But we shall see!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure the price is odd. You can currently find the <a href="http://www.gpsreview.net/delorme-pn-40/#sdctable">pn-40 for $299</a> and just because it is &#8220;newer&#8221; doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean it has better or even the same features as the 40. Since the designation is between the 20 and 40, that might imply a feature-set between as well, in-line with the price. But we shall see!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/delorme-pn-30/#comment-62618</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2370#comment-62618</guid>
		<description>I noticed the pricing is lower than the PN-40 and one site had a release date of 6/21. Though that date might not mean much, but the lower price is odd compared to the PN-40.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the pricing is lower than the PN-40 and one site had a release date of 6/21. Though that date might not mean much, but the lower price is odd compared to the PN-40.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
