<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magellan Sold to MiTAC (Mio)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gpsreview.net/magellan-sold-to-mitac-mio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/magellan-sold-to-mitac-mio/</link>
	<description>GPS Reviews for Garmin, Magellan, TomTom, and other GPS Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:27:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/magellan-sold-to-mitac-mio/#comment-53601</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 02:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2134#comment-53601</guid>
		<description>Mitac has actually been building many of Magellan&#039;s devices for a couple of years now. So they have an existing manufacturing relationship-- for better or worse. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitac has actually been building many of Magellan&#8217;s devices for a couple of years now. So they have an existing manufacturing relationship&#8211; for better or worse. <img src='http://www.gpsreview.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/magellan-sold-to-mitac-mio/#comment-53436</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2134#comment-53436</guid>
		<description>Having worked in the computer industry for 25+ years and ~10 years of dealing with Mitac, I would be concerned about this buy out.  I have trained numerous Mitac engineers and redesigned lots of their products - Mitac lacks basic engineering knowledge in terms of high speed signaling and reading spec&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having worked in the computer industry for 25+ years and ~10 years of dealing with Mitac, I would be concerned about this buy out.  I have trained numerous Mitac engineers and redesigned lots of their products &#8211; Mitac lacks basic engineering knowledge in terms of high speed signaling and reading spec&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/magellan-sold-to-mitac-mio/#comment-53408</link>
		<dc:creator>John S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2134#comment-53408</guid>
		<description>In spite of the mixed feelings I have as a long-time Magellean owner- if it keeps the lines afloat, it is for the best.  Have not been much impressed with Mio product, but the consolidation could well be a win-win.
  And I think Tim is surely right- Not continuing the named lines from Magellan would be hard to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In spite of the mixed feelings I have as a long-time Magellean owner- if it keeps the lines afloat, it is for the best.  Have not been much impressed with Mio product, but the consolidation could well be a win-win.<br />
  And I think Tim is surely right- Not continuing the named lines from Magellan would be hard to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gatorguy</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/magellan-sold-to-mitac-mio/#comment-53401</link>
		<dc:creator>gatorguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2134#comment-53401</guid>
		<description>I did notice the Crossover line has been discontinued</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did notice the Crossover line has been discontinued</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/magellan-sold-to-mitac-mio/#comment-53311</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2134#comment-53311</guid>
		<description>My guess is that the Magellan name as well as the Maestro and Triton product lines will continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that the Magellan name as well as the Maestro and Triton product lines will continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/magellan-sold-to-mitac-mio/#comment-53310</link>
		<dc:creator>Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2134#comment-53310</guid>
		<description>Will MiTAC(Mio) support and develop Magellan&#039;s Triton line of products, or is the Triton line dead?  Any information on the company&#039;s intentions or their commitment to Magellan&#039;s current line of products?  If they could put a little more effort into developing the Triton firmware, then they could have an awesome product with widespread support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will MiTAC(Mio) support and develop Magellan&#8217;s Triton line of products, or is the Triton line dead?  Any information on the company&#8217;s intentions or their commitment to Magellan&#8217;s current line of products?  If they could put a little more effort into developing the Triton firmware, then they could have an awesome product with widespread support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gatorguy</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/magellan-sold-to-mitac-mio/#comment-53255</link>
		<dc:creator>gatorguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2134#comment-53255</guid>
		<description>My guess as to how this will shake out: 

I made mention in the forums a while back that I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to see Mio exit the US market next year, except perhap[s as a supplier of software services or private build. With this purchase I expect Mio devices to start being released under the Magellan name. They still have a much larger brand recognition than Mio, and perhaps Mio will be better able to manage the support services than Shah Capital was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess as to how this will shake out: </p>
<p>I made mention in the forums a while back that I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see Mio exit the US market next year, except perhap[s as a supplier of software services or private build. With this purchase I expect Mio devices to start being released under the Magellan name. They still have a much larger brand recognition than Mio, and perhaps Mio will be better able to manage the support services than Shah Capital was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
