<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TomTom Route Planner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gpsreview.net/tomtom-route-planner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/tomtom-route-planner/</link>
	<description>GPS Reviews for Garmin, Magellan, TomTom, and other GPS Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:27:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/tomtom-route-planner/#comment-67039</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2130#comment-67039</guid>
		<description>Carl, the TomTom Route Planner is in beta. When they release version 1.0 I suspect that functionality and more will be in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl, the TomTom Route Planner is in beta. When they release version 1.0 I suspect that functionality and more will be in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/tomtom-route-planner/#comment-67037</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2130#comment-67037</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t you send a Route from Route Planner to the actual TomTOm?

The reason I am using the route planner is because the route TomTom gives is me ridiculously convoluted and not even close to the best way to get there. Route Planner shows a far better way. But there&#039;s no way to send that route to the TomTom. It&#039;s insane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t you send a Route from Route Planner to the actual TomTOm?</p>
<p>The reason I am using the route planner is because the route TomTom gives is me ridiculously convoluted and not even close to the best way to get there. Route Planner shows a far better way. But there&#8217;s no way to send that route to the TomTom. It&#8217;s insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/tomtom-route-planner/#comment-56307</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2130#comment-56307</guid>
		<description>Seems quite cool, I&#039;ll have to give this a try sometime :p

Go TomTom!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems quite cool, I&#8217;ll have to give this a try sometime :p</p>
<p>Go TomTom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bukosky</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/tomtom-route-planner/#comment-53189</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bukosky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2130#comment-53189</guid>
		<description>It&#039;d be nice if they did the courtesy of a reply when signing up for the beta. I&#039;ve been waiting for something from them like Mapsource. I also think that the traffic is marginally useful, but it is a work in progress. Hope it becomes useful before I retire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;d be nice if they did the courtesy of a reply when signing up for the beta. I&#8217;ve been waiting for something from them like Mapsource. I also think that the traffic is marginally useful, but it is a work in progress. Hope it becomes useful before I retire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gatorguy</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/tomtom-route-planner/#comment-53116</link>
		<dc:creator>gatorguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2130#comment-53116</guid>
		<description>Maybe I was a little mistaken then. . .

Boy, you sure know how to ruin a good time. LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I was a little mistaken then. . .</p>
<p>Boy, you sure know how to ruin a good time. LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gatorguy</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/tomtom-route-planner/#comment-53110</link>
		<dc:creator>gatorguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2130#comment-53110</guid>
		<description>Now it makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now it makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/tomtom-route-planner/#comment-53109</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2130#comment-53109</guid>
		<description>From the TomTom Route Planner:

&lt;blockquote&gt;If you choose to leave now or within 30 minutes, current traffic conditions are taken into account when planning your route.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the TomTom Route Planner:</p>
<blockquote><p>If you choose to leave now or within 30 minutes, current traffic conditions are taken into account when planning your route.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gatorguy</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/tomtom-route-planner/#comment-53062</link>
		<dc:creator>gatorguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 01:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2130#comment-53062</guid>
		<description>One hope for HD here in the US may come from Navteq. They are currently beta-testing a system in California that looks as tho it uses the same reliance on cellphone movement as TT is using with VodaPhone in Europe. One advantage they may have is Nokia (and their GPS-enabled phones) owning Navteq, making the integration a little more transparent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One hope for HD here in the US may come from Navteq. They are currently beta-testing a system in California that looks as tho it uses the same reliance on cellphone movement as TT is using with VodaPhone in Europe. One advantage they may have is Nokia (and their GPS-enabled phones) owning Navteq, making the integration a little more transparent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mafferik</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/tomtom-route-planner/#comment-53056</link>
		<dc:creator>mafferik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 23:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2130#comment-53056</guid>
		<description>They should, although I&#039;m not sure how accurate and granular the traffic information will be by just relying on road sensor data and fleet management systems. I&#039;m unsure whether TomTom or anybody else is able to create cellular network based traffic information here in the US, like they do in Europe. Here&#039;s a link to a press release to the launch of HDTraffic in Portugal, no mention of launching this in the US</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should, although I&#8217;m not sure how accurate and granular the traffic information will be by just relying on road sensor data and fleet management systems. I&#8217;m unsure whether TomTom or anybody else is able to create cellular network based traffic information here in the US, like they do in Europe. Here&#8217;s a link to a press release to the launch of HDTraffic in Portugal, no mention of launching this in the US</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gatorguy</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/tomtom-route-planner/#comment-53037</link>
		<dc:creator>gatorguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 13:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=2130#comment-53037</guid>
		<description>As long as you consider the limitations of the traffic reporting effectiveness, no reason not to. The inclusion of IQRouting has the potential to make it more reliable than Google or Mapquest, altho it seems I read that Google intends to include current traffic and traffic speeds in their routing engine. MSN has started doing so for major metro areas (I noticed it in Tampa Friday), and since Google is using TeleAtlas maps now for the US, it shouldn&#039;t be long before IQRoutes is included there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as you consider the limitations of the traffic reporting effectiveness, no reason not to. The inclusion of IQRouting has the potential to make it more reliable than Google or Mapquest, altho it seems I read that Google intends to include current traffic and traffic speeds in their routing engine. MSN has started doing so for major metro areas (I noticed it in Tampa Friday), and since Google is using TeleAtlas maps now for the US, it shouldn&#8217;t be long before IQRoutes is included there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
