<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding L2C ( L2 ) GPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gpsreview.net/understanding-l2c-l2-gps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/understanding-l2c-l2-gps/</link>
	<description>GPS Reviews for Garmin, Magellan, TomTom, and other GPS Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:27:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rod Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/understanding-l2c-l2-gps/#comment-41596</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=745#comment-41596</guid>
		<description>Benny, you are on the right track. GPS is like a radio receiver... with an extremely narrow frequency range and weak signal. Whenever you hear &quot;different frequency, think; additional discrete narrow band electronics inside. The antennas are narrow band also, so it means more electronics there too. Realistically, consumer grade receivers are cost driven so don&#039;t expect to see L2 or L5 showing up in the near future. It&#039;s more likely you&#039;ll see Galileo L1 and that won&#039;t be for a few years as it stands today.
Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benny, you are on the right track. GPS is like a radio receiver&#8230; with an extremely narrow frequency range and weak signal. Whenever you hear &#8220;different frequency, think; additional discrete narrow band electronics inside. The antennas are narrow band also, so it means more electronics there too. Realistically, consumer grade receivers are cost driven so don&#8217;t expect to see L2 or L5 showing up in the near future. It&#8217;s more likely you&#8217;ll see Galileo L1 and that won&#8217;t be for a few years as it stands today.<br />
Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GPS Review</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/understanding-l2c-l2-gps/#comment-2890</link>
		<dc:creator>GPS Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 12:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=745#comment-2890</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid actually making an L2C receiver is beyond my technical abilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid actually making an L2C receiver is beyond my technical abilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benny</title>
		<link>http://www.gpsreview.net/understanding-l2c-l2-gps/#comment-2888</link>
		<dc:creator>Benny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 09:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gpsreview.net/?p=745#comment-2888</guid>
		<description>  After reading the article above, I know that the receiver antenna has to be changed to receive two diffenert frequency signals (one is L1, the other is L2C). 
  My question is: can you explain more about the receiver modification for accommodating L2C based on L1 receiver?  such as the change in RF Front-end, correlator and chipset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading the article above, I know that the receiver antenna has to be changed to receive two diffenert frequency signals (one is L1, the other is L2C).<br />
  My question is: can you explain more about the receiver modification for accommodating L2C based on L1 receiver?  such as the change in RF Front-end, correlator and chipset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
